![](/f/f/52ad72d74d7a41fbd3221df65c618287.jpg)
Bieżący numer
Archiwum
Artykuły zaakceptowane
O czasopiśmie
Rada naukowa
Bazy indeksacyjne
Prenumerata
Kontakt
Zasady publikacji prac
Standardy etyczne i procedury
Panel Redakcyjny
Zgłaszanie i recenzowanie prac online
|
4/2023
vol. 27 Artykuł przeglądowy
The use of medical devices in people with hemiparesis of the upper limb and the presentation of the competence of the master and specialist of physiotherapy in the prescription of orthopedic supplies
Bernadeta Faustyna Piwowar-Kuczyńska
1
,
Michał Zabojszcz
2
,
Monika Urbaniak
3
,
Rafał Trąbka
4
,
Mateusz Curyło
5, 6
Physiotherapy Review, 2023, 27(4), 38-44
Data publikacji online: 2023/12/21
Plik artykułu:
- art5_4-23.pdf
[0.20 MB]
ENW EndNote
BIB JabRef, Mendeley
RIS Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
1. Nikamp CD, Buurke JH, van der Palen J, Hermens HJ, Rietman JS. Early or delayed provision of an ankle-foot orthosis in patients with acute and subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2017; 31 (6): 798–808. 2.
Nadler M, Pauls M. Shoulder orthoses for the prevention and reduction of hemiplegic shoulder pain and subluxation: systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2017; 31 (4): 444–453. 3.
Yeung LF, Ockenfeld C, Pang MK, Wai HW, Soo OY, Li SW, et al. Randomized controlled trial of robot-assisted gait training with dorsiflexion assistance on chronic stroke patients wearing ankle-foot-orthosis. J Neuroengineering Rehabil. 2018; 15 (1) :51. 4.
Kolář P. Rehabilitace v klinické praxis [Rehabilitation in clinical practice]. Galén; 2009. pp. 516–520. 5.
Andringa AS, Van de Port IGL, Meijer JWG. Tolerance and effectiveness of a new dynamic handwrist orthosis in chronic stroke patients. NeuroRehabilitation. 2013; 33 (2): 225–231. 6.
Winstein CJ, Stein J, Arena R, Bates B, Cherney LR, Cramer SC, et al. Guidelines for Adult Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2016; 47 (6): e98–169. 7.
Meng X, Ren M, Zhuang Y, Qu Y, Jiang L, Li Z. Application Experience and Patient Feedback Analysis of 3D Printed AFO with Different Materials: A Random Crossover Study. BioMed Res Int. 2021; 2021: 8493505. 8.
Fuksová B. Možnosti ortézování paretických končetin u pacientů po CMP [Options for paretic limb bracing in patients after stroke]. 2017. Available at: https://dspace.cuni.cz/handle/20.500.11956/85015 9.
Andriske L, Verikios D, Hitch D. Patient and Therapist Experiences of the SaeboFlex: A Pilot Study. Occup Ther Int. 2017: e5462078. 10.
Hoffman J, Hoffman A, Ozdarska K, Sochanek M. Rehabilitacja kończyny górnej po udarze mózgu [Rehabilitation of the upper limb after stroke]. In: Choroby XXI wieku – wyzwania w pracy fizjoterapeuty [Diseases of the 21st century – challenges in the work of a physiotherapist], Ed. Podgórska M Wydawnictwo Wyższej Szkoły Zarządzania, Gdańsk 2017. Available at: https://depot.ceon.pl/ bitstream/handle/123456789/14520/Rehabilitacja%20kończyny%20górnej%20po%20udarze%20 mózgu.pdf?sequence=1 11.
Śliwiński Z, Sieroń A, Szczegielniak J. Wielka fizjoterapia [The great physiotherapy]. Ed. I Polish. Edra Urban & Partner 2017, Wrocław 2014. p. 467. 12.
Curyło M, Rynkiewicz-Andryśkiewicz M, Mikos M, Kiljański M, Śliwiński Z, Raczkowski J.W. Wyroby medyczne wydawane na zlecenie w praktyce fizjoterapeuty [Prescription medical devices in the practice of a physiotherapist]. Fizjoter Pol. 2020; 20 (3): 180–183. 13.
Moskiewicz D, Mraz M, Chamela-Bilińska D. Botulinum Toxin and Dynamic Splint Restore Grasping Function after Stroke: A Case Report. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20 (6): 4873. 14.
Lannin NA, Cusick A, Hills C, Kinnear B, Vogel K, Matthews K, et al. Upper limb motor training using a Saebo orthosis is feasible for increasing task-specific practice in hospital after stroke. Aust Occup Ther J. 2016; 63 (6): 364–372. 15.
Khallaf ME, Ameer MA, Fayed EE. Effect of task specific training and wrist-fingers extension splint on hand joints range of motion and function after stroke. NeuroRehabilitation. 2017; 41 (2): 437–444. 16.
Wong Y, Li CJZ, Ada L, Zhang T, Månum G, Langhammer B. Upper Limb Training with a Dynamic Hand Orthosis in Early Subacute Stroke: A Pilot Randomized Trial. J Rehabil Med. 2022; 54. 17.
Zheng Y, Liu G, Yu L, Wang Y, Fang Y, Shen Y, et al. Effects of a 3D-printed orthosis compared to a low-temperature thermoplastic plate orthosis on wrist flexor spasticity in chronic hemiparetic stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2020; 34 (2): 194–204. 18.
Hoppe-Ludwig S, Armitage J, Turner KL, O’Brien MK, Mummidisetty CK, Koch LM, et al. Usability, functionality, and efficacy of a custom myoelectric elbow-wrist-hand orthosis to assist elbow function in individuals with stroke. J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2021; 8. 19.
Dunaway S, Dezsi DB, Perkins J, Tran D, Naft J. Case Report on the Use of a Custom Myoelectric Elbow– Wrist–Hand Orthosis for the Remediation of Upper Extremity Paresis and Loss of Function in Chronic Stroke. Mil Med. 2017; 182 (7): e1963–8. 20.
Sharma GS, Singh YN, Joy A, Singh B, Touthang AT, Devi T. Study of Effectiveness of Shoulder Elbow Wrist Hand Orthosis in the Management of Glenohumeral Subluxation in Post-stroke Hemiplegic Patients. Indian J Phys Med Rehabil. 2016; 27 (3): 78–86.
|