en ENGLISH
eISSN: 2719-9665
ISSN: 2719-5139
Physiotherapy Review
Bieżący numer Archiwum Artykuły zaakceptowane O czasopiśmie Rada naukowa Bazy indeksacyjne Prenumerata Kontakt Zasady publikacji prac Standardy etyczne i procedury
Panel Redakcyjny
Zgłaszanie i recenzowanie prac online
4/2024
vol. 28
 
Poleć ten artykuł:
Udostępnij:
Artykuł przeglądowy

The effect of dynamic and static virtual reality environments on the prevalence of cybersickness symptoms

Konrad Młyńczak
1
,
Witold Pawełczyk
2
,
Javier Molina Jimenez
3
,
Alejandro Galán-Mercant
3, 4
,
Sebastian Rutkowski
2

  1. Descartes' Error Student Scientific Circle, Opole University of Technology, Opole, Poland
  2. Department of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Opole University of Technology, Opole, Poland
  3. Department of Nursing and Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad de Cádiz, Cádiz, Spain
  4. Institute of Biomedicine of Cádiz, Biomedical Research and Innovation Institute of Cadiz (INiBICA), Cádiz, Spain
Physiotherapy Review, 2024, 28(4), 46-56
Data publikacji online: 2024/12/20
Plik artykułu:
- art5_4_2024.pdf  [0.29 MB]
Pobierz cytowanie
 
Metryki PlumX:
 
1. Rutkowski SM, Galán-Mercant A. Artificial intelligence in rehabilitation: comparing OpenAI ChatGPT recommendations to evidence-based meta-analyses. Physiotherapy Review. 2023; 27 (4): 5–16.
2. Gallagher M, Ferre ER. Cybersickness: a Multisensory Integration Perspective. Multisens Res. 2018; 31 (7): 645–674.
3. Freeman D, Reeve S, Robinson A, Ehlers A, Clark D, Spanlang B, et al. Virtual reality in the assessment, understanding, and treatment of mental health disorders. Psychol Med. 2017; 47 (14): 2393–2400.
4. Tao G, Garrett B, Taverner T, Cordingley E, Sun C. Immersive virtual reality health games: a narrative review of game design. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation. 2021; 18 (1).
5. Carnevale A, Mannocchi I, Sassi MSH, Carli M, De Luca G, Longo UG, et al. Virtual Reality for Shoulder Rehabilitation: Accuracy Evaluation of Oculus Quest 2. Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22 (15).
6. Sanchez-Herrera-Baeza P, Cano-de-la-Cuerda R, Ona-Simbana ED, Palacios-Cena D, Perez-Corrales J, Cuenca-Zaldivar JN, et al. The Impact of a Novel Immersive Virtual Reality Technology Associated with Serious Games in Parkinson's Disease Patients on Upper Limb Rehabilitation: A Mixed Methods Intervention Study. Sensors (Basel). 2020; 20 (8)
7. Kipping B, Rodger S, Miller K, Kimble RM. Virtual reality for acute pain reduction in adolescents undergoing burn wound care: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Burns. 2012; 38 (5): 650– 657.
8. Iosa M, Aydin M, Candelise C, Coda N, Morone G, Antonucci G, et al. The Michelangelo Effect: Art Improves the Performance in a Virtual Reality Task Developed for Upper Limb Neurorehabilitation. Front Psychol. 2020; 11: 611956.
9. Chryssolouris G, Mavrikios D, Fragos D, Karabatsou V. A virtual reality-based experimentation environment for the verification of human-related factors in assembly processes. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing. 2000; 16 (4): 267–276.
10. Oh H, Son W. Cybersickness and Its Severity Arising from Virtual Reality Content: A Comprehensive Study. Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22 (4).
11. Stanney KM, Kennedy RS, Drexler JM. Cybersickness is Not Simulator Sickness. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 1997; 41 (2): 1138–1142.
12. Kiryu T, So RH. Sensation of presence and cybersickness in applications of virtual reality for advanced rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2007; 4: 34.
13. Weech S, Kenny S, Barnett-Cowan M. Presence and Cybersickness in Virtual Reality Are Negatively Related: A Review. Front Psychol. 2019; 10: 158.
14. Kourtesis P, Papadopoulou A, Roussos P. Cybersickness in Virtual Reality: The Role of Individual Differences, Its Effects on Cognitive Functions and Motor Skills, and Intensity Differences during and after Immersion. Virtual Worlds. 2024; 3 (1) :62–93.
15. Weech S, Varghese JP, Barnett-Cowan M. Estimating the sensorimotor components of cybersickness. J Neurophysiol. 2018; 120 (5): 2201–2217.
16. Bonato F, Bubka A, Palmisano S. Combined pitch and roll and cybersickness in a virtual environment. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2009; 80 (11): 941–945.
17. Chang E, Billinghurst M, Yoo B. Brain activity during cybersickness: a scoping review. Virtual Real. 2023: 1–25.
18. Dużmańska N, Strojny P, Strojny A. Can Simulator Sickness Be Avoided? A Review on Temporal Aspects of Simulator Sickness. Frontiers in Psychology. 2018; 9.
19. Martirosov S, Bures M, Zitka T. Cyber sickness in low-immersive, semi-immersive, and fully immersive virtual reality. Virtual Real. 2022; 26 (1): 15–32.
20. Litleskare S, Calogiuri G. Camera Stabilization in 360 degrees Videos and Its Impact on Cyber Sickness, Environmental Perceptions, and Psychophysiological Responses to a Simulated Nature Walk: A Single-Blinded Randomized Trial. Front Psychol. 2019; 10: 2436.
21. Kim DJ, Kim H, Kim K, Kim MJ, Jeon HJ. Association between anxiety and skin conductance according to the intensity of shaking of virtual reality images. Front Psychiatry. 2023; 14: 1196767.
22. Yip SH, Saunders JA. Restricting the distribution of visual attention reduces cybersickness. Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2023; 8 (1): 18.
23. Pavlou M, Kanegaonkar RG, Swapp D, Bamiou DE, Slater M, Luxon LM. The effect of virtual reality on visual vertigo symptoms in patients with peripheral vestibular dysfunction: a pilot study. J Vestib Res. 2012; 22 (5-6): 273–281.
24. Micarelli A, Viziano A, Micarelli B, Augimeri I, Alessandrini M. Vestibular rehabilitation in older adults with and without mild cognitive impairment: Effects of virtual reality using a head-mounted display. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2019; 83: 246–256.
25. Espinoza M, Baños RM, García-Palacios A, Cervera JM, Esquerdo G, Barrajón E, et al. Promotion of emotional wellbeing in oncology inpatients using VR. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics. 2012; 181: 53–57.

© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.