 
       
      | Bieżący numer
			Archiwum
		
					Artykuły zaakceptowane
				O czasopiśmie
						Rada naukowa
					Bazy indeksacyjne
		
			
					Prenumerata
				Kontakt
				Zasady publikacji prac
	     			Standardy etyczne i procedury Panel Redakcyjny Zgłaszanie i recenzowanie prac online | 
		2/2021
	 vol. 25 Artykuł przeglądowy Review of Selected Physiotherapeutic Methods Used in the Rehabilitation of Low Back Pain in Light of Evidence-Based Medicine Principles
	
	             Aleksander  Kaletka
	         1 
 Physiotherapy Review, 2021, 25(2), 5-15 Data publikacji online: 2021/06/23 Plik artykułu: ENWEndNote BIBJabRef, Mendeley RISPapers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero AMA APA Chicago Harvard MLA Vancouver 1. Hoy D, Bain C, Williams G, et al. A systematic re view of the global prevalence of low back pain. Ar thritis 2. 
Rheum. 2012; 64: 2028-2037.  3. 
Kamper S.J. et al. Musculoskeletal pain in children  and adolescents. Braz J Phys Ther. 2016; 16: 10.  4. 
Global Burden of Disease, Injury Incidence, Preva lence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national  incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disabi lity for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990–2015: a sys tematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease  Study 2015. Lancet 2016; 388: 1545-1602.  5. 
Hartvigsen J. et al. What low back pain is and why  we need to pay attention. Lancet 2018; 391: 2356- 2367.  6. 
Balagué F. et al. Non-specific low back pain. Lancet  2012; 379: 482-491.  7. 
Hoy D. i wsp. The Epidemiology of low back pain.  Best Pract Res: Clin Rheumatol. 2010; 24: 769-781.  8. 
Główny Urząd Statystyczny. (2016) Stan Zdrowia  Ludności Polski w 2014 r. Dostęp: https://stat.gov. pl/obszary-tematyczne/zdrowie/zdrowie/stan- -zdrowia-ludnosci-polski-w-2014-r-,6,6.html.  9. 
Garcia A.N. et al. McKenzie Method of Mechanical  Diagnosis and Therapy was slightly more effecti ve than placebo for pain, but not for disability, in  patients with chronic non-specific low back pain: a  randomised placebo controlled trial with short and  longer term follow-up. Br J Sports Med. 2018: 52 (9):  594-600.  10. 
Halliday M.H. et al. A Randomized Controlled Trial  Comparing the McKenzie Method to Motor Control  Exercises in People With Chronic Low Back Pain  and a Directional Preference. J Orthop Sports Phys  Ther. 2016; 46 (7): 514-522.  11. 
Hodges P.W., van Dieën J.H., Cholewicki J. Time to  Reflect on the Role of Motor Control in Low Back  Pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2019; 49 (6): 367- 369.  12. 
Murtezani A. et al. A comparison of mckenzie the rapy with electrophysical agents for the treatment  of work-related low back pain: A randomized con trolled trial. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2015; 28  (2): 247-253.  13. 
Ebadi S. et al. No immediate analgesic effect of dia dynamic current in patients with non-specific low  back pain in comparison to TENS. J Bodyw Mov  Ther. 2018; 22 (3): 693-699.  14. 
Facci L.M. et al. Effects of transcutaneous electri cal nerve stimulation (TENS) and interferential cu rrents (IFC) in patients with non-specific chronic  low back pain: randomized clinical trial. Sao Paulo  Med J. 2011; 129 (4): 206-216.  15. 
Buchmuller A. et al. Value of TENS for relief of chronic low back pain with or without radicular pain.  Eur J Pain 2012; 16: 656-665.  16. 
Valenza M.C. et al. Results of a Pilates exercise  program in patients with chronic non-specific low  back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Reha bil. 2017; 31 (6): 753-760.  17. 
Cruz-Díaz D. et al. The effectiveness of 12 weeks  of Pilates intervention on disability, pain and kine siophobia in patients with chronic low back pain: a  randomized controlled trial. Clin. Rehabil. 2018; 32  (9): 1249-1257.  18. 
Natour J. et al. Pilates improves pain, function and  quality of life in patients with chronic low back  pain: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil.  2015; 29 (1): 59-68. |