Physiotherapy Review
en ENGLISH
eISSN: 2719-9665
ISSN: 2719-5139
Physiotherapy Review
Bieżący numer Archiwum Artykuły zaakceptowane O czasopiśmie Rada naukowa Bazy indeksacyjne Prenumerata Kontakt Zasady publikacji prac Standardy etyczne i procedury
Panel Redakcyjny
Zgłaszanie i recenzowanie prac online
Wyszukiwanie
Zasady redakcyjne
Sarajevo Declaration on Integrity and Visibility of Scholarly Publications
1/2026
vol. 30
 
Poleć ten artykuł:
Wyślij znajomemu
Udostępnij:
Artykuł przeglądowy

Postural control and gait quality in individuals in the chronic phase of stroke undergoing mobile robotic-assisted training: a pilot randomized clinical trial

Kamila Niewolak
1
,
Joanna Antkiewicz
1
,
Laura Jadwiga Piejko
2, 3
,
Julia Duda
3
,
Bogna Szołtys-Brzezowska
3, 4
,
Agnieszka Nawrat-Szołtysik
4, 5
,
Cezary Kucio
4, 5
,
Anna Polak
3, 4

  1. Medical and Rehabilitation Center, “Solanki”, Poland
  2. Clinical Department of Physiotherapy in Psychiatry, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, Katowice, Poland
  3. Department of Clinical Physiotherapy, Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, Institute of Physiotherapy and Health Sciences, Katowice, Poland
  4. Institute of Physiotherapy and Health Sciences, Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, Katowice, Poland
  5. Department of Physiotherapy in Internal Diseases, Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, Katowice
Research, Physiotherapy Review, 2026, 30(1), 62-81
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/phr.2026.160363
Data publikacji online: 2026/03/26
Plik artykułu:
- art7_1_2026.pdf  [0.35 MB]
Pobierz cytowanie
 
Metryki PlumX:
 
1. Johnson CO, Nguyen M, Roth GA, Nichols E, Alam T, Abate D, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019; 18 (5): 439–458.
2. Feigin VL, Norrving B, Mensah GA. Global burden of stroke. Circ Res. 2017; 120 (3): 439–448.
3. Stewart C, Subbarayan S, Paton P, et al. Non-pharmacological interventions for the improvement of post-stroke quality of life amongst older stroke survivors: a systematic review of systematic reviews (the SENATOR ONTOP series). Drugs Aging. 2019; 36 (Suppl 1): 43–58.
4. Alawieh A, Zhao J, Feng W. Factors affecting poststroke motor recovery: implications on neurotherapy after brain injury. Behav Brain Res. 2018; 340: 94–101.
5. Grefkes C, Fink GR. Recovery from stroke: current concepts and future perspectives. Neurol Res Pract. 2020; 2: 17.
6. Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA, Cook EW 3rd, Fleming WC, Nepomuceno CS, et al. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993; 74 (4): 347–354.
7. Mallo-López A, Cuesta-Gómez A, Fernández-Pardo TE, Aguilera-Rubio Á, Molina-Rueda F. Influence of impaired upper extremity motor function on static balance in people with chronic stroke. Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24 (13): 4311.
8. Sterr A, Elbert T, Berthold I, Koelbel S, Rockstroh B, Taub E. Longer versus shorter daily constraint-induced movement therapy of chronic hemiparesis: an exploratory study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002; 83 (10): 1374–1377.
9. Sullivan KJ, Knowlton BJ, Dobkin BH. Step training with body weight support: effect of treadmill speed and practice paradigms on poststroke locomotor recovery. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002; 83 (5): 683–691.
10. Vecchio M, Chiaramonte R, De Sire A, Buccheri E, Finocchiaro P, Scaturro D, et al. Do proprioceptive training strategies with dual-task exercises positively influence gait parameters in chronic stroke? A systematic review. J Rehabil Med. 2024; 56: jrm18396.
11. Dettmers C, Teske U, Hamzei F, Uswatte G, Taub E, Weiller C. Distributed form of constraint-induced movement therapy improves functional outcome and quality of life after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86 (2): 204–209.
12. Cho KH, Lee WH. Effect of treadmill training based real-world video recording on balance and gait in chronic stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Gait Posture. 2014; 39 (1): 523–528.
13. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Stroke rehabilitation in adults. NICE guideline NG236. London: NICE; 2023.
14. De Peretti C, Grimaud O, Tuppin P, Chin F, Woimant F. Prévalence des accidents vasculaires cérébraux et de leurs séquelles et impact sur les activités de la vie quotidienne. Bull Epidemiol Hebd. 2012; 1: 1–6.
15. Jørgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Recovery of walking function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen stroke study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995; 76 (1): 27–32.
16. Wade DT, Wood VA, Heller A, Maggs J, Langton HR. Walking after stroke: measurement and recovery over the first 3 months. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1987; 19 (1): 25–30.
17. Hesse S. Treadmill training with partial body weight support after stroke: a review. NeuroRehabilitation. 2008; 23 (1): 55–65.
18. Tasseel-Ponche S, Yelnik AP, Bonan IV. Motor strategies of postural control after hemispheric stroke. Neurophysiol Clin. 2015; 45 (4–5): 327–333.
19. Pohl PS, Perera S, Duncan PW, Maletsky R, Whitman R, Studenski S. Gains in distance walking in a 3-month follow-up poststroke: what changes? Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2004; 18 (1): 30–36.
20. De Haart M, Geurts AC, Huidekoper SC, Fasotti L, Van Limbeek J. Recovery of standing balance in postacute stroke patients: a rehabilitation cohort study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004; 85 (6): 886–895.
21. Lamb SE, Ferrucci L, Volpato S, Fried LP, Guralnik JM. Risk factors for falling in home-dwelling older women with stroke: the Women’s Health and Aging Study. Stroke. 2003; 34 (2): 494–501. 80 Physiotherapy Review | Volume XXX Issue 1/2026
22. Belgen B, Beninato M, Sullivan PE, Narielwalla K. The association of balance capacity and falls self-efficacy with history of falling in community- dwelling people with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006; 87 (4): 554–561.
23. Schmid AA, Van Puymbroeck M, Altenburger PA, Miller KK, Combs SA, Page SJ. Balance is associated with quality of life in chronic stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2013; 20 (4): 340–346.
24. Eng JJ, Pang MYC, Ashe MC. Balance, falls, and bone health: role of exercise in reducing fracture risk after stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008; 45 (2): 297–314.
25. Dietz V, Müller R. Degradation of neuronal function following a spinal cord injury: mechanisms and countermeasures. Brain. 2004; 127 (10): 2221–2231.
26. Hubli M, Bolliger M, Limacher E. Spinal neuronaldysfunction after stroke. Exp Neurol. 2012; 234 (1):153–160.
27. Dietz V, Grillner S, Trepp A. Changes in spinal reflex and locomotor activity after a complete spinal cord injury: a common mechanism? Brain. 2009; 132 (8): 2196–2205.
28. Hubli M, Dietz V, Bolliger M. Spinal reflex activity: a marker for neuronal functionality after spinal cord injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012; 26 (2): 188–196.
29. Dietz V. Physiological consequences of CNS damage.In: Dietz V, Ward N, editors. Oxford textbook of neurorehabilitation. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015. p. 60–75.
30. Dietz V, Müller R, Colombo G. Locomotor activity in spinal man: significance of afferent input from joint and load receptors. Brain. 2002; 125 (12): 2626–2634.
31. Tefertiller C, Pharo B, Evans N. Efficacy of rehabilitation robotics for walking training in neurological disorders: a review. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011; 48 (4): 387–416.
32. Langhorne P, Bernhardt J, Kwakkel G. Stroke rehabilitation.Lancet. 2011; 377 (9778): 1693–1702.
33. Morone G, Iosa M, Bragoni M. Who may benefit from robotic-assisted gait training? A randomized clinical trial in patients with subacute stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011; 25 (7): 636–644.
34. Morone G, Iosa M, Bragoni M. Who may have durablebenefit from robotic gait training? A 2-year follow-up randomized controlled trial in patients with subacute stroke. Stroke. 2012; 43 (4): 1140–1142.
35. Mehrholz J, Elsner B, Werner C. Electromechanical-assisted training for walking after stroke: updated evidence. Stroke. 2013; 44 (10): e127–e128.
36. Nam KY, Kim HJ, Kwon BS. Robot-assisted gait training improves walking function and activity in people with spinal cord injury: a systematic review. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017; 14 (1): 24.
37. Louie DR, Eng JJ, Lam T. Gait speed using powered robotic exoskeletons after spinal cord injury: a systematic review and correlational study. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015; 12: 82.
38. Calabrò RS, Cacciola A, Bertè F, et al. Robotic gaitrehabilitation and substitution devices in neurological disorders: where are we now? Neurol Sci. 2016; 37 (4): 503–514.
39. Colombo G, Joer M, Schreier R. Locomotor trainingin paraplegic patients. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2000; 37 (6): 693–700.
40. Hussain S, Xie SQ, Jamwal PK. An intrinsically compliantrobotic orthosis for treadmill training. Med Eng Phys. 2012; 34 (10): 1448–1453.
41. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975; 12 (3): 189–198.
42. Yesavage JA, Brink TL, Rose TL, Lum O, Huang V, Adey M, et al. Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report. J Psychiatr Res. 1982; 17 (1): 37–49.
43. Brott T, Adams HP, Olinger CP, et al. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke. 1989; 20 (7): 864–870.
44. Ashworth B. Preliminary trial of carisoprodol in multiple sclerosis. Practitioner. 1964; 192: 540–542.
45. Charalambous CP. Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Class Pap Orthop. 2014: 415–417.
46. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med J. 1965; 14: 61–65.81 Physiotherapy Review | Volume XXX Issue 1/2026
47. Berg K, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI, Maki B. Measuring balance in the elderly: validation of an instrument. Can J Public Health. 1992; 83 (Suppl 2): 7–S11.
48. Duncan PW, Weiner DK, Chandler J, Studenski S. Functional reach: a new clinical measure of balance. J Gerontol. 1990; 45 (6): M192–M197.
49. Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed “Up & Go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991; 39 (2): 142–148.
50. Rossier P, Wade DT. Validity and reliability comparison of four mobility measures in patients presenting with neurologic impairment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001; 82 (1): 9–13.
51. Husemann B, Muller F, Krewer C, Heller S, Koenig E. Effects of locomotion training with assistance of a robot-driven gait orthosis in hemiparetic patients after stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study. Stroke. 2007; 38 (2): 349–354.
52. Mayr A, Kofler M, Quirbach E, Matzak H, Frohlich K, Saltuari L. Prospective, blinded, randomized crossover study of gait rehabilitation in stroke patients using the Lokomat gait orthosis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007; 21 (4): 307–314.
53. Hornby TG, Campbell DD, Kahn JH, Demott T, Moore JL, Roth HR. Enhanced gait-related improvements after therapist-versus robotic-assisted locomotor training in subjects with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled study. Stroke. 2008; 39 (6): 1786–1792.
54. Schwartz I, Sajin A, Fisher I, Neeb M, Shochina M, Katz-Leurer M, et al. The effectiveness of locomotor therapy using robotic-assisted gait training in subacute stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. PM R. 2009; 1 (6): 516–523.
55. Chang WH, Kim MS, Huh JP, Lee PK, Kim YH. Effects of robot-assisted gait training on cardiopulmonary fitness in subacute stroke patients: a randomized controlled study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012; 26 (4): 318–324.
56. Hidler J, Nichols D, Pelliccio M, Brady K, Campbell DD, Kahn JH, et al. Multicenter randomized clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of the Lokomat in subacute stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009; 23 (1): 5–13.
57. van Nunen MPM, Gerrits KHL, Konijnenbelt M,Janssen TWJ, de Haan A. Recovery of walking ability using a robotic device in subacute stroke patients: a randomized controlled study. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015; 10 (2): 141–148.
58. Han EY, Im SH, Kim BR, Seo MJ, Kim MO. Robot-assistedgait training improves brachial–ankle pulse wave velocity and peak aerobic capacity in subacute stroke patients with totally dependent ambulation: andomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016; 95 (41): e5078.
59. Feigin VL, Brainin M, Norrving B, Martins SO, PandianJ, Lindsay P, et al. World Stroke Organization: global stroke fact sheet 2025. Int J Stroke. 2025; 20 (2): 132–144.
PUBLISHER

Termedia
O Wydawnictwie Oferty Newsletter Kontakt Praca
Polityka prywatności Polityka reklamowa Napisz do nas Nota prawna Regulamin
Na skróty
Aktualności Czasopisma Książki eBooki Konferencje i webinary Podcasty Mednauka
Serwisy
KONGRES TOP MEDICAL TRENDS Menedżer Zdrowia Lekarz POZ Choroby rzadkie Dermatologia Diabetologia Onkologia Neurologia Reumatologia Gastroenterologia Pulmonologia Ginekologia Kurier Medyczny Zalecenia i rekomendacje e-Praktyka Leczenia Ran Warto wiedzieć Biblioteka podcastów
e-Akademia
e-Akademia Zaburzeń Mikrobioty e-Akademia POChP e-Akademia Chorób Naczyń
© 2026 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Termedia.