Physiotherapy Review

Pełna treść

2/2023 vol. 27
Artykuł oryginalny

Influence of high-velocity low amplitude manipulation of the lumbar spine on the activity of motor units of the erector spinal muscles with functional assessment in healthy young people

  1. The University of Applied Sciences in Tarnow, Poland
  2. The University of Applied Sciences in Nowy Sacz, Poland
Physiotherapy Review, 2023, 27(2), 45-51
Data publikacji online: 2023/06/28
Plik artykułu
art5 2_2023.pdf
Confronting perimenopausal women’s knowledge of coronary heart disease with their health behaviours. Controversial role of hormone replacement therapy in the protection of coronary heart disease
  1. Erhard R, Piva SR. Efficacy of Manual Therapy. Or- thop Phys Ther Secrets. 2006; 72 (12): 102–111.
  2. Bialosky JE, Bishop MD, Price DD, Robinson ME, George SZ. The mechanisms of manual therapy in the treatment of musculoskeletal pain: A com- prehensive model. Man Ther. 2009; 14 (5): 531–538. doi:10.1016/j.math.2008.09.001
  3. Rubinstein SM, Van Middelkoop M, Assendelft WJJ, De Boer MR, Van Tulder MW. Spinal manipulative therapy for chronic low-back pain: An update of a cochrane review. Spine. 2011; 36 (13): 2–5.
  4. Gyer G, Michael J, Inklebarger J, Tedla JS. Spinal manipulation therapy: Is it all about the brain? A current review of the neurophysiological effects of manipulation. J Integr Med. 2019; 17 (5): 328–337.
  5. Pickar JG. Neurophysiological effects of spinal ma- nipulation. Spine J. 2002; 2 (5): 357–371.
  6. Bicalho ES, Palma Setti JA, Macagnan J, Rivas Cano JL, Manffra EF, Muth S, et. al. Immediate effects of a high-velocity spine manipulation in paraspinal muscles activity of nonspecific chronic low-back pain subjects. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. Fourth Edi. 2015; 16 (4): 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.ptsp.2016.06.010.
  7. Lehman GJ, McGill SM. Spinal manipulation causes variable spine kinematic and trunk muscle electro- myographic responses. Clin Biomech. 2001; 16 (4): 293–299.
  8. Ferreira ML, Ferreira PH, Hodges PW. Changes in postural activity of the trunk muscles following spinal manipulative therapy. Man Ther. 2007; 12 (3): 240–248.
  9. Bicalho E, Palma Setti JA, Macagnan J, Rivas Cano JL, Manffra EF. Immediate effects of a high-velocity spine manipulation in paraspinal muscles activity of nonspecific chronic low back pain subjects. Man Ther. 2010; 15 (5): 469–475.
  10. Lehman G. Kinesiological research: The use of sur- face electromyography for assessing the effects of spinal manipulation. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2012; 22 (5): 692–696. doi:10.1016/j.jelekin.2012.02.010.
  11. Konrad P. ABCs of EMG - A practical introduc- tion to kinesiology electromyography [ABC EMG - Praktyczne wprowadzenie do elektromiografii kin- ezjologicznej]. Noraxon INC. USA, Technomex Sp. z o.o., Gliwice 2007.
  12. Thiel GJ. The effectiveness of spinal manipulation at L3 on lumbar paraspinal extensor muscle endur- ance in asymptomatic males. Dissertation for the Masters’ Degree in Technology: Chiropractic Dur- ban University of Technology, Republic of South Africa, 2000.
  13. Lee SY, Sung KH, Chung CY, Lee KM, Kwon SS, Kim TG, et al. Reliability and validity of the Duncan-Ely test for assessing rectus femoris spasticity in pa- tients with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2015; 57 (10): 963–968.
  14. Herzog W, Scheele D, Conway PJ. Electromyograph- ic responses of back and limb muscles associated with spinal manipulative therapy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999; 24 (2): 146–153. doi:10.1097/00007632- 199901150-00012
  15. Herzog W, Kats M, Symons B. The effective forces transmitted by high-speed, low-amplitude thorac- ic manipulation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001; 26 (19): 2105–2111. doi:10.1097/00007632-200110010-00012
  16. Agyapong-Badu S, Warner M, Samuel D, Stokes M. Measurement of ageing effects on muscle tone and mechanical properties of rectus femoris and biceps brachii in healthy males and females using a novel hand-held myometric device. Arch Gerontol Geri- atr. 2016; 62: 59–67. doi:10.1016/j.archger.2015.09.011
  17. PetrofskyJS,LindAR.Theinfluenceoftemperature on the amplitude and frequency components of the EMG during brief and sustained isometric contrac- tions. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1980; 44 (2): 189–200. doi:10.1007/BF00421098
  18. Baars H, Jöllenbeck T, Humburg H, Schröder J. Sur- face-electromyography: skin and subcutaneous fat tissue attenuate amplitude and frequency param- eters. 2007.
  19. Suter E, McMorland G, Herzog W, Bray R. Decrease in quadriceps inhibition after sacroiliac joint ma- nipulation in patients with anterior knee pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1999; 22 (3):149–153.
  20. Grindstaff TL, Hertel J, Beazell JR, Magrum EM, Ingersoll CD. Effects of lumbopelvic joint manip- ulation on quadriceps activation and strength in healthy individuals. Man Ther. 2009; 14 (4): 415–420. doi:10.1016/j.math.2008.06.005
Udostępnij