| 
                                    	Current issue
			Archive
		
					Manuscripts accepted
				About the journal
						Editorial board
					Abstracting and indexing
		
			
	
					Subscription
				Contact
				Instructions for authors
	     			Ethical standards and procedures
			
	
	 Editorial System 
	Submit your Manuscript 
                
                                                                                                            
    
    
    
 | 
                        
           3/2023
	 
       vol. 27 abstract: 
   Original paper 
Effect of blood flow restriction cuffs on joint proprioception with the example of the wrist
                       
   
                    Klaudia  Kusienicka
                 
                                     
                       1
                     
                                                                
 Physiotherapy Review, 2023, 27(3), 13-19 
   
Online publish date: 2023/09/22 
   
      View
         full text
       
	
	Get citation
 
ENW EndNote
		BIB JabRef, Mendeley
		RIS Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
		
		AMA 
			
			APA 
			
			
			Chicago 
			
			
			Harvard 
			
			
			MLA 
			
			
			Vancouver 
			
		
		
    Background 
   Occlusion training, also known as blood-flow restriction training (BFR), is an exercise method in which the arterial inflow is partially restricted and the venous outflow is fully restricted in working muscles during exercise. Training performed under occlusion conditions is as effective as weight training with heavy loads. Joint proprioception plays a crucial role in maintaining stability and coordination during movement and protects against injury-causing movements. There is still a lack of studies on the effects of occlusion on joint position sense (JPS). Aims This study aimed to evaluate the effect of occlusion training by application of inflating tourniquets on joint proprioception using the example of the wrist. Material and methods The study group consisted of 40 volunteers, randomly divided into two groups: BFR and Placebo. The joint position sense test was performed twice in both groups using the Biodex isokinetic dynamometer. Measurement 1 was taken without an occlusion cuff. During measurement 2, in the BFR Group, an occlusion cuff was placed and inflated on the arm of the tested limb. In the Placebo Group, the cuff was applied but not inflated. The test was performed bilaterally for two target positions: 45° dorsiflexion and 30° palmar flexion. The subjects had their eyes covered with a blindfold. The analyzed parameter was the difference between the targeted position and the achieved position (°). Results The results obtained in measurements 1 and 2 were compared in both groups using the t-student test for the dependent groups. In both groups, the results of measurements 1 and 2 obtained for the target position of 45° were comparable (p=0.094-0.863). For 30°, in the BRF Group, the angular error was greater in measurement 2 than in measurement 1 (p=0.005-0.035). In the Placebo Group, there was no difference between measurements 1 and 2 (p=0.086-0.379). Conclusions This pilot study showed that the occlusion training cuffs placed on the upper arm may negatively affect wrist proprioception. keywords: 
   proprioception, occlusion training, occlusion cuffs, blood-flow restriction training, isokinetic assessment |