Bieżący numer
Archiwum
Artykuły zaakceptowane
O czasopiśmie
Rada naukowa
Bazy indeksacyjne
Prenumerata
Kontakt
Zasady publikacji prac
Standardy etyczne i procedury
Panel Redakcyjny
Zgłaszanie i recenzowanie prac online
|
3/2023
vol. 27 streszczenie artykułu:
Artykuł oryginalny
Effect of blood flow restriction cuffs on joint proprioception with the example of the wrist
Klaudia Kusienicka
1
Research, Physiotherapy Review, 2023, 27(3), 13-19
Data publikacji online: 2023/09/22
Pełna treść artykułu
Pobierz cytowanie
ENW EndNote
BIB JabRef, Mendeley
RIS Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
Background Occlusion training, also known as blood-flow restriction training (BFR), is an exercise method in which the arterial inflow is partially restricted and the venous outflow is fully restricted in working muscles during exercise. Training performed under occlusion conditions is as effective as weight training with heavy loads. Joint proprioception plays a crucial role in maintaining stability and coordination during movement and protects against injury-causing movements. There is still a lack of studies on the effects of occlusion on joint position sense (JPS). Aims This study aimed to evaluate the effect of occlusion training by application of inflating tourniquets on joint proprioception using the example of the wrist. Material and methods The study group consisted of 40 volunteers, randomly divided into two groups: BFR and Placebo. The joint position sense test was performed twice in both groups using the Biodex isokinetic dynamometer. Measurement 1 was taken without an occlusion cuff. During measurement 2, in the BFR Group, an occlusion cuff was placed and inflated on the arm of the tested limb. In the Placebo Group, the cuff was applied but not inflated. The test was performed bilaterally for two target positions: 45° dorsiflexion and 30° palmar flexion. The subjects had their eyes covered with a blindfold. The analyzed parameter was the difference between the targeted position and the achieved position (°). Results The results obtained in measurements 1 and 2 were compared in both groups using the t-student test for the dependent groups. In both groups, the results of measurements 1 and 2 obtained for the target position of 45° were comparable (p=0.094-0.863). For 30°, in the BRF Group, the angular error was greater in measurement 2 than in measurement 1 (p=0.005-0.035). In the Placebo Group, there was no difference between measurements 1 and 2 (p=0.086-0.379). Conclusions This pilot study showed that the occlusion training cuffs placed on the upper arm may negatively affect wrist proprioception. |