|
Bieżący numer
Archiwum
Artykuły zaakceptowane
O czasopiśmie
Rada naukowa
Bazy indeksacyjne
Prenumerata
Kontakt
Zasady publikacji prac
Standardy etyczne i procedury
Panel Redakcyjny
Zgłaszanie i recenzowanie prac online
|
4/2025
vol. 29 Artykuł oryginalny
Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric testing of the Hausa version of the London Handicap Scale among stroke survivors in Nigeria
Muhammad Aliyu Abba
1
,
Olubukola Adebisi Olaleye
2
,
Talhatu Kolapo Hamzat
2
Research, Physiotherapy Review, 2025, 29(4), 39-52
Data publikacji online: 2025/12/22
Plik artykułu:
- art4_4_2025.pdf
[0.41 MB]
ENW EndNote
BIB JabRef, Mendeley
RIS Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
1. Arabambi B, Oshinaike O, Akilo OO, et al. Pattern, risk factors, and outcome of acute stroke in a Nigerian university teaching hospital: A 1-year review. Niger J Med. 2021; 30: 252–258. 2.
Eze CO, Afolabi OF, Kalu UA, et al. Pattern of neurological disorders in an adult neurology clinic at Abakaliki. Global J Health Sci. 2021; 13 (8): 72–76. 3.
Mayo NE, Wood-Dauphinee S, Côté R, Durca L, Carlton J. Activity, participation and quality of life 6 months post-stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002; 83: 1035–1042. 4.
Rimmer JH. Use of the ICF in identifying factors that impact participation in physical activity/rehabilitation among people with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil. 2006; 28 (17): 1087–1095. 5.
Baker SM, Marshak HH, Rice GT, et al. Patient participation in physical therapy goal setting. Phys Ther. 2001; 81 (5): 1118–1126. 6.
Noonan VK, Kopec JA, Noreau L, et al. A review of participation instruments based on the ICF. Disabil Rehabil. 2009; 31 (23): 1883–1901. 7.
Tse T, Douglas J, Lentin P, et al. Measuring participation after stroke: a review of frequently used tools. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013; 94 (1): 177–192. 8.
Harwood RH, Rogers A, Dickinson E, et al. Measuring handicap: the London Handicap Scale. Qual Health Care. 1994; 3: 11–16. 9.
Jenkinson C, Mant J, Carter J, et al. The London Handicap Scale: re-evaluation of validity. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000; 68: 365–367. 10.
Groothuis-Oudshoorn CGM, Chorus AMJ, Verrips GHW, et al. Development and validation of the Dutch version of the London Handicap Scale. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2015; 28 (2): 401–408. 11.
Westergren A, Hagell P. Initial validation of the Swedish version of the London Handicap Scale. Qual Life Res. 2006; 15 (7): 1251–1256. 12.
Kutlay S, Küçükdeveci AA, Yanık B, et al. Interval scaling properties of the London Handicap Scale. Clin Rehabil. 2011; 25 (3): 248–255. 13.
Lo R, Harwood R, Woo J, et al. Cross-cultural validation of the London Handicap Scale in Hong Kong Chinese. Clin Rehabil. 2001; 15 (2): 177–185. 14.
Hamzat TK, Peters GO. The London Handicap Scale—Validation of a Yoruba version. Afr J Neurol Sci. 2009; 28 (1): 61–66. 15.
Keszei AP, Novak M, Streiner DL. Introduction to health measurement scales. J Psychosom Res. 2010; 68 (4): 319–323. 16.
Maher CG, Latimer J, Costa LOP. Relevance of cross-cultural adaptation and clinimetrics for PT instruments. Braz J Phys Ther. 2007; 11 (4): 245–252. 17.
Odetunde MO, Akinpelu AO, Odole AC. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Stroke Specific QoL scale (Hausa version). J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2018; 2 (1): 63. 18.
Sada A, Abdullahi A, Hassan AB. Hausa translation and validation of the Motor Activity Log. Disabil Rehabil. 2021; 43 (16): 2375–2381. 19.
Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung. Small Dictionary of Nigerian Languages. 2025. Available from: https:// www.kas.de/ 20.
Sabiu IT, Zainol FA, Abdullahi MS. Hausa people of Northern Nigeria and their development. APJ. 2018; 1 (1): 179–189. 21.
Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000; 25 (24): 3186–3191. 22.
.Hair JF, Black WC, Babin B, Anderson R, Tatham R. Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th ed. Pearson; 2010. 23.
Kuan G, Sabo A, Sawang S, et al. Factorial validity and measurement invariance of the Malay decisional balance scale. PLoS One. 2020; 15 (3): e0230644
|
 |
ENGLISH
