en POLSKI
eISSN: 2719-9665
ISSN: 2719-5139
Physiotherapy Review
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
2/2023
vol. 27
 
Share:
Share:
Original article

Influence of high-velocity low amplitude manipulation of the lumbar spine on the activity of motor units of the erector spinal muscles with functional assessment in healthy young people

Maciej Oleksiewicz
1
,
Piotr Czech
2

  1. The University of Applied Sciences in Tarnow, Poland
  2. The University of Applied Sciences in Nowy Sacz, Poland
Research, Physiotherapy Review, 2023, 27(2), 45-51
Online publish date: 2023/06/28
Article file
- art5 2_2023.pdf  [0.22 MB]
Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
 
1. Erhard R, Piva SR. Efficacy of Manual Therapy. Or- thop Phys Ther Secrets. 2006; 72 (12): 102–111.
2. Bialosky JE, Bishop MD, Price DD, Robinson ME, George SZ. The mechanisms of manual therapy in the treatment of musculoskeletal pain: A com- prehensive model. Man Ther. 2009; 14 (5): 531–538. doi:10.1016/j.math.2008.09.001
3. Rubinstein SM, Van Middelkoop M, Assendelft WJJ, De Boer MR, Van Tulder MW. Spinal manipulative therapy for chronic low-back pain: An update of a cochrane review. Spine. 2011; 36 (13): 2–5.
4. Gyer G, Michael J, Inklebarger J, Tedla JS. Spinal manipulation therapy: Is it all about the brain? A current review of the neurophysiological effects of manipulation. J Integr Med. 2019; 17 (5): 328–337.
5. Pickar JG. Neurophysiological effects of spinal ma- nipulation. Spine J. 2002; 2 (5): 357–371.
6. Bicalho ES, Palma Setti JA, Macagnan J, Rivas Cano JL, Manffra EF, Muth S, et. al. Immediate effects of a high-velocity spine manipulation in paraspinal muscles activity of nonspecific chronic low-back pain subjects. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. Fourth Edi. 2015; 16 (4): 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.ptsp.2016.06.010.
7. Lehman GJ, McGill SM. Spinal manipulation causes variable spine kinematic and trunk muscle electro- myographic responses. Clin Biomech. 2001; 16 (4): 293–299.
8. Ferreira ML, Ferreira PH, Hodges PW. Changes in postural activity of the trunk muscles following spinal manipulative therapy. Man Ther. 2007; 12 (3): 240–248.
9. Bicalho E, Palma Setti JA, Macagnan J, Rivas Cano JL, Manffra EF. Immediate effects of a high-velocity spine manipulation in paraspinal muscles activity of nonspecific chronic low back pain subjects. Man Ther. 2010; 15 (5): 469–475.
10. Lehman G. Kinesiological research: The use of sur- face electromyography for assessing the effects of spinal manipulation. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2012; 22 (5): 692–696. doi:10.1016/j.jelekin.2012.02.010.
11. Konrad P. ABCs of EMG - A practical introduc- tion to kinesiology electromyography [ABC EMG - Praktyczne wprowadzenie do elektromiografii kin- ezjologicznej]. Noraxon INC. USA, Technomex Sp. z o.o., Gliwice 2007.
12. Thiel GJ. The effectiveness of spinal manipulation at L3 on lumbar paraspinal extensor muscle endur- ance in asymptomatic males. Dissertation for the Masters’ Degree in Technology: Chiropractic Dur- ban University of Technology, Republic of South Africa, 2000.
13. Lee SY, Sung KH, Chung CY, Lee KM, Kwon SS, Kim TG, et al. Reliability and validity of the Duncan-Ely test for assessing rectus femoris spasticity in pa- tients with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2015; 57 (10): 963–968.
14. Herzog W, Scheele D, Conway PJ. Electromyograph- ic responses of back and limb muscles associated with spinal manipulative therapy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999; 24 (2): 146–153. doi:10.1097/00007632- 199901150-00012
15. Herzog W, Kats M, Symons B. The effective forces transmitted by high-speed, low-amplitude thorac- ic manipulation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001; 26 (19): 2105–2111. doi:10.1097/00007632-200110010-00012
16. Agyapong-Badu S, Warner M, Samuel D, Stokes M. Measurement of ageing effects on muscle tone and mechanical properties of rectus femoris and biceps brachii in healthy males and females using a novel hand-held myometric device. Arch Gerontol Geri- atr. 2016; 62: 59–67. doi:10.1016/j.archger.2015.09.011
17. PetrofskyJS,LindAR.Theinfluenceoftemperature on the amplitude and frequency components of the EMG during brief and sustained isometric contrac- tions. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1980; 44 (2): 189–200. doi:10.1007/BF00421098
18. Baars H, Jöllenbeck T, Humburg H, Schröder J. Sur- face-electromyography: skin and subcutaneous fat tissue attenuate amplitude and frequency param- eters. 2007.
19. Suter E, McMorland G, Herzog W, Bray R. Decrease in quadriceps inhibition after sacroiliac joint ma- nipulation in patients with anterior knee pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1999; 22 (3):149–153.
20. Grindstaff TL, Hertel J, Beazell JR, Magrum EM, Ingersoll CD. Effects of lumbopelvic joint manip- ulation on quadriceps activation and strength in healthy individuals. Man Ther. 2009; 14 (4): 415–420. doi:10.1016/j.math.2008.06.005

Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.