|
Current issue
Archive
Manuscripts accepted
About the journal
Editorial board
Abstracting and indexing
Subscription
Contact
Instructions for authors
Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
|
3/2024
vol. 28 Review paper
Evaluation of the effects of gait reeducation in a child using the automated Prodrobot gait trainer – a case report
Karolina Szumilas
1
,
Wiesław Chwała
2
,
Katarzyna Fedejko
3
Physiotherapy Review, 2024, 28(3), 50-62
Online publish date: 2024/09/26
Article file
- art6_3_2024.pdf
[0.77 MB]
ENW EndNote
BIB JabRef, Mendeley
RIS Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
1. Knox V, Evans AL. Evaluation of the functional effects of a course of Bobath therapy in children with cerebral palsy: a preliminary study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2002; 44 (7): 447–460. 2.
Zasadzka E, Pawlaczyk M, Wieczorowska-Tobis K. Short Physical Performance Battery test as a tool for assessing the physical fitness of the elderly [Test Short Physical Performance Battery jako narzędzie służące do oceny sprawności fizycznej osób starszych]. Gerontol Pol. 2013; 4: 148–153. 3.
Kear BM, Guck TP, McGaha AL. Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test: Normative Reference Values for Ages 20 to 59 Years and Relationships With Physical and Mental Health Risk Factors. J Prim Care Community Health. 2017; 8 (1): 9–13. 4.
Małecka B, Sędziwy L, Lelakowski J, et al. The usefulness of six minute walking test in follow-up of paced patients [Przydatność testu 6-minutowego marszu do oceny ambulatoryjnej pacjentów z rozrusznikiem serca]. Via Med. 2002; 9 (3): 259–264. 5.
Panella L, Tinelli C, Buizza A, Lombardi R, Gandolfi R. Towards objective evaluation of balance in the elderly: validity and reliability of a measurement instrument applied to the Tinetti test. Int J Rehabil Res. 2008; 31 (1): 65–72. 6.
Kirtley C. Clinical Gait Analysis.Theory and Practise. Elsevier: Oxford, 2006. 7.
Głowiński S. Analiza biomechaniczna chodu prawidłowego. TTS, 2013. 8.
Perry J, Burnfield M. Gait analysis - normal and pathological function. New Jersey, 2010. 9.
Barbeau H. Locomotor training in neurorehabilitation: emerging rehabilitation concepts. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2003; 17 (1): 3–11. 10.
Jankowska E. Concept and tools of measuring of the quality of life. Torun Int Stud. 2011; 1 (4): 33–40. 11.
Patritti BL, Sicari M, Demming LC, et al. The role of augmented feedback in pediatric robotic-assisted gait training: A case series. Technol Disabil. 2010; 22: 215–227. 12.
Larkin TA, Ashcroft E, Elgellaie A, Hickey BA. Ventrogluteal versus dorsogluteal site selection: A cross-sectional study of muscle and subcutaneous fat thicknesses and an algorithm incorporating demographic and anthropometric data to predict injection outcome. Int J Nurs Stud. 2017; 71: 1–7. 13.
Brütsch K, Koenig A, Zimmerli L, Mérillat-Koeneke S, Riener R, Jäncke L, van Hedel HJ, Meyer-Heim A. Virtual reality for enhancement of robot-assisted gait training in children with central gait disorders. J Rehabil Med. 2011; 43 (6): 493–499. 14.
Lefmann S, Russo R, Hillier S. The effectiveness of robotic-assisted gait training for paediatric gait disorders: systematic review. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017; 14 (1): 1.
|
 |
POLSKI
