|
Current issue
Archive
Manuscripts accepted
About the journal
Editorial board
Abstracting and indexing
Subscription
Contact
Instructions for authors
Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
|
2/2025
vol. 29 Research paper
Assessment of the impact of neuromobilization and transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation on vagus nerve function
Kamil Jakub Burnagiel
1
,
Filip Georgiew
1
Research, Physiotherapy Review, 2025, 29(2), 55-65
Online publish date: 2025/06/26
Article file
- art6_2_2025.pdf
[0.40 MB]
ENW EndNote
BIB JabRef, Mendeley
RIS Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
1. PIŚShaffer F, McCraty R, Zerr CL. A healthy heart is not a metronome: an integrative review of the heart’s anatomy and heart rate variability. Front Psychol. 2014; 5. 2.
Nunan D, Sandercock GRH, Brodie DA. A quantitative systematic review of normal values for shortterm heart rate variability in healthy adults. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2010; 33: 1407–1417. 3.
Shaffer F, Meehan ZM, Zerr CL. A Critical Review of Ultra-Short-Term Heart Rate Variability Norms Research. Front Neurosci. 2020; 14: 594880. 4.
Butt MF, Albusoda A, Farmer AD, Aziz Q. The anatomical basis for transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation. J Anat. 2020; 236: 588–611. 5.
Yang J, Ben-Menachem E. Accuracy and clinical utility of heart rate variability derived from awearable heart rate monitor in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. J Clin Monit Comput. 2024; 38: 433–443. 6.
Perrotta AS, Jeklin AT, Hives BA, Meanwell LE, Warburton DER. Validity of the Elite HRV Smartphone Application for Examining Heart Rate Variability in a Field-Based Setting. J Strength Cond Res. 2017; 31: 2296–22302. 7.
Moya-Ramon M, Mateo-March M, Peña-González I, Zabala M, Javaloyes A. Validity and reliability of different smartphones applications to measure HRV during short and ultra-short measurements in elite athletes. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2022; 217: 106696. 8.
Yokota H, Edama M, Hirabayashi R, Sekine C, Otsuru N, Saito K, et al. Effects of Stimulus Frequency, Intensity, and Sex on the Autonomic Response to Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation. Brain Sci. 2022; 12: 1038. 9.
Sclocco R, Garcia RG, Kettner NW, Fisher HP, Isenburg K, Makarovsky M, et al. Stimulus frequency modulates brainstem response to respiratory-gated transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation. Brain Stimul. 2020; 13: 970–978. 10.
Kozorosky EM, Lee CH, Lee JG, Nunez Martinez V, Padayachee LE, Stauss HM. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation augments postprandial inhibition of ghrelin. Physiol Rep. 2022; 10: e15253. 11.
Badran BW, Yu AB, Adair D, Mappin G, DeVries WH, Jenkins DD, et al. Laboratory Administration of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation (taVNS): Technique, Targeting, and Considerations. J Vis Exp. 2019: 10.3791/58984. 12.
Carta G, Seregni A, Casamassima A, Galli M, Geuna S, Pagliaro P, et al. Validation and Reliability of a Novel Vagus Nerve Neurodynamic Test and Its Effects on Heart Rate in Healthy Subjects: Little Differences Between Sexes. Front Neurosci. 2021; 15: 698470. 13.
Höper S, Kaess M, Koenig J. Prefrontal cortex oxygenation and autonomic nervous system activity under transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation in adolescents. Auton Neurosci. 2022; 241: 103008. 14.
Tran N, Asad Z, Elkholey K, Scherlag BJ, Po SS, Stavrakis S. Autonomic Neuromodulation Acutely Ameliorates Left Ventricular Strain in Humans. J Cardiovasc Trans Res. 2019; 12: 221–230. 15.
Clancy JA, Mary DA, Witte KK, Greenwood JP, Deuchars SA, Deuchars J. Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation in healthy humans reduces sympathetic nerve activity. Brain Stimul. 2014; 7 (6): 871–877. 16.
Burger AM, Van der Does W, Thayer JF, Brosschot JF, Verkuil B. Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation reduces spontaneous but not induced negative thought intrusions in high worriers. Biol Psychol. 2019; 142: 80–89. 17.
Weise D, Adamidis M, Pizzolato F, Rumpf J-J, Fricke C, Classen J. Assessment of brainstem function with auricular branch of vagus nerve stimulation in Parkinson’s disease. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0120786. 18.
Bretherton B, Atkinson L, Murray A, Clancy J, Deuchars S, Deuchars J. Effects of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation in individuals aged 55 years or above: potential benefits of daily stimulation. Aging (Albany NY) 2019; 11: 4836–4857. 19.
Stein PK, Kleiger RE, Rottman JN. Differing effects of age on heart rate variability in men and women. Am J Cardiol. 1997; 80: 302–305. 20.
Packheiser J, Hartmann H, Fredriksen K, Gazzola V, Keysers C, Michon F. A systematic review and multivariate meta-analysis of the physical and mental health benefits of touch interventions. Nat Hum Behav. 2024: 1–20MIENNICTWO
|
 |
POLSKI
