|
Current issue
Archive
Manuscripts accepted
About the journal
Editorial board
Abstracting and indexing
Subscription
Contact
Instructions for authors
Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
|
3/2022
vol. 26 abstract:
Review paper
Comparison of selected clinical tests for the assessment of ACL injury with respect to sensitivity and specificity - a review paper
Angelika Sosulska
1
,
Dorota Ankowska
2
,
Barbara Szczurowska
3
,
Małgorzata Jekiełek
1
,
Grzegorz Mańko
1
1.
Department of Biomechanics and Kinesiology, Institute of Physiotherapy, Jagiellonian University Collegium Medicum,
Kraków, Poland
2.
Activus Rehabilitation, Węgrzce Wielkie, Poland
3.
Fizjomed Sp.z.o.o., Skrzydlna, Poland
Physiotherapy Review, 2022, 26(3), 23-32
Online publish date: 2022/09/28
View full text
Get citation
ENW EndNote
BIB JabRef, Mendeley
RIS Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
The knee joint is prone to injury due to its complexity and weight-bearing function. Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is a common knee injury with severe complications in the young and physically active population. This study aimed to perform a comparative evaluation of the Lachman, Anterior Drawer, Pivot-shift, and Lever tests in terms of sensitivity and specificity. According to existing research, the Lachman test appears to have the highest overall diagnostic accuracy, and the pivot-shift test has the highest specificity but low sensitivity results. The anterior drawer test has average results in both specificity and sensitivity. However, the Lever test can be successfully used by inexperienced individuals and patients immediately after injury (in the acute state)
keywords:
anterior drawer test, Lachman test, pivot-shift test, Lever test, sensitivity, specificity, ACL injuries |
 |
POLSKI
